Youths · 9-12 · Lesson 6
Joseph and Providence
Genesis 37:18-36; Genesis 45:1-15; Genesis 50:15-21
God's purposes continued through human wrongdoing without making wrongdoing good.
Teach the lesson
Goal: Students explain Genesis 50:20 without calling the brothers’ wrongdoing good.
Pick how long you want to teach. The plan updates to fit.
Short · 25 minutes
- 3 minConnect
Use the opening prompt from the Teach Now card.
- 8 minRead
Read Genesis 37:18-36 and 50:15-21, making separate notes for intention, action, consequence, and later outcome.
Ask: Which words and actions show the brothers’ intention?
- 5 minUnderstand
Compare the two intentions in Genesis 50:20 and test applications against the whole narrative.
Ask: What good purpose does Joseph identify later? · Why does a good outcome not make an evil act good?
- 6 minDo
Complete the Intention, Action, Outcome Grid activity.
Activity: Intention, Action, Outcome Grid
Printable: Y1-L06-P01-intention-action-outcome-grid
- 3 minRespond
Repeat the take-home line and close in prayer.
Ask: What must be considered before trust is restored?
Standard · 35 minutes
- 4 minConnect
Use the opening prompt and invite two or three brief responses.
- 4 minContext
Introduce the passage setting, speaker or main characters, and genre in age-appropriate language.
- 8 minRead and observe
Read Genesis 37:18-36 and 50:15-21, making separate notes for intention, action, consequence, and later outcome.
Ask: Which words and actions show the brothers’ intention? · What good purpose does Joseph identify later?
- 7 minDiscuss
Compare the two intentions in Genesis 50:20 and test applications against the whole narrative.
Ask: Why does a good outcome not make an evil act good? · What must be considered before trust is restored?
- 8 minActivity
Complete the Intention, Action, Outcome Grid activity and review what it demonstrates.
Activity: Intention, Action, Outcome Grid
Printable: Y1-L06-P01-intention-action-outcome-grid
- 4 minRespond
Review the objective, repeat the take-home line, and pray.
Extended · 45 minutes
- 4 minConnect
Use the opening prompt and identify the question the lesson will answer.
- 6 minContext
Locate the passage in the whole-Bible story and explain its literary setting.
- 9 minRead closely
Read Genesis 37:18-36 and 50:15-21, making separate notes for intention, action, consequence, and later outcome.
Ask: Which words and actions show the brothers’ intention? · What good purpose does Joseph identify later?
- 8 minInterpret
Compare the two intentions in Genesis 50:20 and test applications against the whole narrative.
Ask: Why does a good outcome not make an evil act good? · What must be considered before trust is restored?
- 7 minActivity one
Complete the Intention, Action, Outcome Grid activity.
Activity: Intention, Action, Outcome Grid
Printable: Y1-L06-P01-intention-action-outcome-grid
- 7 minActivity two
Complete the Slogan Audit activity and compare the results.
Activity: Slogan Audit
- 4 minRespond and assess
Use one quiz item orally, repeat the take-home line, and pray.
Close the class
Memory verse: Genesis 50:20
Prayer: Ask for trust in God, moral clarity, and wisdom in forgiveness and safety.
Take-home line: God can continue His good purposes through human evil without making the evil good.
More help: full script, questions, and printables
A word-for-word way to run the lesson, plus every question, activity, and printable.
Teach now
Students explain Genesis 50:20 without calling the brothers’ wrongdoing good.
- Read
- Genesis 37:18-36; 50:15-21
- Opening
- Write two headings: What they intended / What God brought about. Ask why those are not the same moral claim.
- Say
- The brothers’ hatred, sale, and deception are named as wrongdoing.
- Joseph’s life in Egypt becomes the means by which many lives are preserved.
- Genesis 50:20 keeps both truths: human evil intention and God’s good purpose.
- Providence is not permission to excuse harm or pretend trust repairs instantly.
- Ask
- What did the brothers intend?
- What outcome does Joseph identify?
- Does the good outcome make the original act good?
- How are forgiveness and restored trust different?
- Do
- Complete the Intention, Action, Outcome Grid using Genesis 37 and 50.
- Close
- Pray for trust in God, truth about wrongdoing, and wisdom in forgiveness and repair.
- Materials
- Bible
- Intention, Action, Outcome Grid
- Pens
Discussion questions
- Which words and actions show the brothers’ intention?
Simple answer: Plot, sell, deceive.
Going deeper: Trace responsibility through the chapter. - What good purpose does Joseph identify later?
Simple answer: Preserving many lives.
Going deeper: Locate the statement in famine and family context. - Why does a good outcome not make an evil act good?
Simple answer: The text still calls the intention evil.
Going deeper: Distinguish outcome, intention, and action ethics. - What must be considered before trust is restored?
Simple answer: Truth, change, safety.
Going deeper: Distinguish forgiveness, reconciliation, trust, and consequences.
Activities
Intention, Action, Outcome Grid · 10 min
Materials: Grid; Pens
- Record the brothers’ intention.
- Record their actions.
- Record harmful consequences.
- Record the life-preserving outcome Joseph identifies.
Low-resource option: Use four board columns.
Slogan Audit · 10 min
Materials: Prepared statements
- Read a providence slogan.
- Identify what is true.
- Identify what it could wrongly excuse.
- Rewrite it with truth, safety, and humility.
Low-resource option: Audit one statement together: “Everything happens for a reason.”
Printables
- Intention, Action, Outcome Grid (worksheet)
Prepare before class (optional, about 25 minutes)
Passage context
The Joseph story spans Genesis 37-50. Genesis 50:20 is a retrospective interpretation after slavery, false accusation, imprisonment, famine, family testing, confession, and provision.
- Genesis 37 repeatedly reports hatred and deception.
- Genesis 45 and 50 contain intense emotion and material provision.
- Genesis 50:20 grammatically contrasts the brothers’ intended evil with God’s intended good.
- Do not isolate Genesis 50:20 from the long narrative.
- Providence can affirm God’s continuing purpose without claiming the harmful act was morally good.
- Reconciliation in Genesis cannot be mechanically applied to unsafe relationships today.
Keep it faithful
- Do not tell a victim that God wanted abuse or that they must immediately trust an offender.
- Do not use providence to erase human responsibility, law, consequences, or safeguarding.
- Do not claim to know the hidden purpose behind every modern tragedy.
- Do not overstate: Do not tell a harmed person that the harm itself was good or that reconciliation erases accountability.
- Do not overstate: Do not claim exhaustive knowledge of why a specific modern harm occurred.
Questions children may ask
- Did God make the brothers do it?
- Do we have to reconcile with anyone who hurts us?
Every child can join in
- Use a visible timeline or comparison grid.
- Allow written, drawn, or spoken responses.
- Model one completed example before independent work.
- Offer a seated alternative to movement activities.
- Read passages aloud in sections.
- Use prepared cards so participation does not depend on fluent reading.